|
St. Paul – the False Apostle
These are two pictures from the Introduction to this website. It is often said that Jesus founded the religion and Paul founded the Church. This is correct, but there is much more to this statement than you might think. Jesus opposed the stifling effect of traditions, and his ministry focused on the disadvantaged and outcasts to society. Paul did not teach this. In fact, Paul did not teach people to follow Jesus. False teaching has been around since the very beginning of the religion. Now that we know the truth, we can start to follow him. I am now going to make a critical analysis of Paul's teachings using the words of Jesus and the clues left by God. I would like to start by mentioning a few things:
Another observation: it would have been better if all the apostles had been eyewitnesses of Jesus because they were in a better position to teach. Why was Paul called? Jesus said that Peter was the rock on which he would build his church; Jesus made no mention of Paul in the Gospels. Satan is an extremely intelligent evil force that can only be identified through analysis using the words of Jesus. For example, it can be seen that these three people (Moses, Paul and Muhammad) were clearly influenced by Satan: Moses, Leviticus 24:13-14: The Lord said to Moses, "Take that man out of the camp. Everyone who heard him curse shall put his hands on the man's head to testify that he is guilty, and then the whole community shall stone him to death." Paul, 1 Corinthians 5:4-5: "As you meet together, and I meet with you in my spirit, by the power of our Lord Jesus present with us, you are to hand this man over to Satan for his body to be destroyed, so that his spirit may be saved in the Day of the Lord." Muhammad, The Cow (2:191): "Kill them wherever you encounter them, and drive them out from where they drove you out, for persecution is more serious than killing." Compare these to the words of Jesus: Jesus, John 8:7: As they stood there asking him questions, he straightened himself up and said to them, "Whichever one of you has committed no sin may throw the first stone at her." There is a clear contradiction between what the Old Testament god told Moses to do (stone someone to death) and what Jesus taught people to do. This indicates that Jesus and the Old Testament god are different entities. The purpose of Satanic influence on the Bible is discussed in other articles (e.g. here). What is false teaching? This is an essential question to ask. False teaching is anything that tells us how to live in a way that contradicts with the teachings of Jesus. Additionally, false teaching is that which supports false teaching or allows others to teach falsely, for example: 1 John 4:2: "This is how you will be able to know whether it is God's Spirit: anyone who acknowledges that Jesus Christ came as a human being has the Spirit who comes from God." – is false because anyone can say that, and then teach whatever they like. 1 John 2:4: "Those who say that they know him, but do not obey his commands, are liars and there is no truth in them." – this is the correct test, but someone like Paul can still give the appearance of following the commandments of Jesus, and teach people to do other things (like set up church traditions). The teachings of Paul are false because they tell us how to live and they are different from how Jesus teaches us how to live. However, the book of Daniel is not false teaching, because it does not tell us how to live and it doesn't allow false teaching or support it (however, it is possible to misinterpret the prophecies). Another classification of teaching is irrelevant teaching; that which doesn't teach anything at all. Philemon comes under this category. Irrelevant teaching can drown out true teaching and for this reason it should be discounted. Another type of teaching is interpreting the Bible and identifying communication from God. That is what some of this website does. Interpretations can be either (a) true, (b) false or (c) irrelevant. In my experience, true interpretations have inbuilt proof to show that they are true, and they correspond with the words of Jesus in relation to how society is shaped. Significant ideas are usually supported by several parables. Irrelevant interpretations drown out true ones. For example, the fact that many people have been predicting the time of the end with no basis whatsoever has made people apathetic. Many of the apostles' letters contain interpretations that do not appear to have meaning or relevance, for example James 2:25 and James 5:17. False teaching can be very subtle – it can consist of omissions of important things, incorrect emphasis of less important things, inventing religious terminology that has no real meaning or is misleading, essentially anything that deviates from the teaching of Jesus in such a way to encourage people not to follow him. One example is that Paul omits to mention the first commandment of Jesus (love the Lord with all your strength, heart, mind, body and soul) because using "all your strength" contradicts with Pauline "grace" – a word to which he assigns the following meaning: Grace (definition according to Pauline theology): (1) God sent Jesus to die. (2) His sacrifice removes your sin. (3) It's a free gift; you don't have to do anything about it except believe that this message is true, because he died on the cross and rose from the dead. Paul does mention in his letters that you should follow Jesus (although he also tells people to imitate himself because he claims to imitate Jesus), but because he teaches "grace" it is very misleading. That is why his teaching is hard to identify as false, because he does mention the truth, but in the context of subtly misleading statements. The overall effect is to encourage people to think that they don't need to follow Jesus in the sense of actually doing all the things that he said. It's as if Jesus came with detailed instructions on how to build a house, and then Paul said that Jesus had already built it, so we don't have to. Here is an example of Paul's false teaching:
The elders who do good work as leaders should be considered worthy of receiving double pay, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching. Jesus teaches us to give up what we have and follow him in Matthew 19:21, Mark 10:21, Luke 12:33, Luke 14:33 and Luke 18:22. A paid priest cannot teach people to follow what Jesus says in these verses because it would be hypocritical – consequentially priests lean towards Paul and propagate Pauline theology. Paul also creates church traditions, after Jesus denounced the existing teachers of the Law as hypocrites, and identified people wearing fancy clothes as living in palaces (a perfect description of the modern day cathedral; Matthew 11:8). Here is another example of false teaching from Paul
"As in all the churches of God's people, 34 the women should keep quiet in the meetings. They are not allowed to speak; as the Jewish Law says, they must not be in charge. 35 If they want to find out about something, they should ask their husbands at home. It is a disgraceful thing for a woman to speak in church. 36 Or could it be that the word of God came from you? Or are you the only ones to whom it came? 37 If anyone supposes he is God's messenger or has a spiritual gift, he must realize that what I am writing to you is the Lord's command. 38 But if he does not pay attention to this, pay no attention to him." Here is another example of a teaching from Paul that is false. Paul treats Jesus as an idol of forgiveness – a replacement for animal sacrifices. This is his 'grace' according to Paul which is defined above. For example:
How We are Put Right with God 21 But now God's way of putting people right with himself has been revealed. It has nothing to do with law, even though the Law of Moses and the prophets gave their witness to it. 22 God puts people right through their faith in Jesus Christ. God does this to all who believe in Christ, because there is no difference at all: everyone has sinned and is far away from God's saving presence. 24 But by the free gift of God's grace all are put right with him through Christ Jesus, who sets them free. 25-26 God offered him, so that by his blood he should become the means by which people's sins are forgiven through their faith in him. God did this in order to demonstrate that he is righteous. In the past he was patient and overlooked people's sins; but in the present time he deals with their sins, in order to demonstrate his righteousness. In this way God shows that he himself is righteous and that he puts right everyone who believes in Jesus.
Romans 6:5-10
Romans 8:31-35 Jesus says:
21 "Not everyone who calls me 'Lord, Lord' will enter the Kingdom of heaven, but only those who do what my Father in heaven wants them to do. 22 When Judgement Day comes, many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord! In your name we spoke God's message, by your name we drove out many demons and performed many miracles!' 23 Then I will say to them, 'I never knew you. Get away from me, you wicked people!'
13 "Go in through the narrow gate, because the gate to hell is wide and the road that leads to it is easy, and there are many who travel it. 14 But the gate to life is narrow and the way that leads to it is hard, and there are few people who find it. Paul's false teaching is extremely difficult to identify because
Paul's letters consist mostly of:
His phrases and keywords are misleading and many are not explained properly, for example:
It is a well known fact that interpersonal communication is only about 8% content – the rest comes from delivery, confidence, body language, intonation and emphasis. As long as someone like Paul looked convincing then people would accept whatever he said, particularly as miracles were performed through him. In turn, he spawned many other people who know how to say the right keywords in the right way to sound convincing. Thus, the Christian religion became based upon a series of key phrases rather than on substance and understanding, resulting in a rule/tradition based system rather than a group of people following Jesus. Philemon – the one book that is very obviously of no use to us 'Philemon' contains the linguistic marker 'phile', which sounds like 'filler'. A 'space filler' is something that is used to fill a gap without performing any useful function. The letter to Philemon is given below: From Paul, a prisoner for the sake of Christ Jesus, and from our brother Timothy – To our friend and fellow-worker Philemon, and the church that meets in your house, and our sister Apphia, and our fellow-soldier Archippus: May God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ give you grace and peace. [Dear Philemon...] Brother Philemon, every time I pray, I mention you and give thanks to my God. For I hear of your love for all God's people and the faith you have in the Lord Jesus. My prayer is that our fellowship with you as believers will bring about a deeper understanding of every blessing which we have in our life in union with Christ. Your love, dear brother, has brought me great joy and much encouragement! You have cheered the hearts of all God's people. [I like you, Philemon] For this reason I could be bold enough, as your brother in Christ, to order you to do what should be done. But because I love you, I make a request instead. I do this even though I am Paul, the ambassador of Christ Jesus, and at present also a prisoner for his sake. So I make a request to you on behalf of Onesimus, who is my own son in Christ; for while in prison I have become his spiritual father. At one time he was of no use to you, but now he is useful. The Greek name Onesimus means "useful" both to you and to me. [There's a man, called Onesimus...] I am sending him back to you now, and with him goes my heart. I would like to keep him here with me, while I am in prison for the gospel's sake, so that he could help me in your place. However, I do not want to force you to help me; rather, I would like you to do it of your own free will. So I will not do anything unless you agree. It may be that Onesimus was away from you for a short time so that you might have him back for all time. And now he is not just a slave, but much more than a slave: he is a dear brother in Christ. How much he means to me! And how much more he will mean to you, both as a slave and as a brother in the Lord! [...and I'm sending him to you, into slavery] So, if you think of me as your partner, welcome him back just as you would welcome me. If he has done you any wrong or owes you anything, charge it to my account. Here, I will write this with my own hand: I, Paul, will pay you back. (I should not have to remind you, of course, that you owe your very self to me.) So, my brother, please do me this favour for the Lord's sake; as a brother in Christ, cheer me up! I am sure, as I write this, that you will do what I ask – in fact I know that you will do even more. At the same time, get a room ready for me, because I hope that God will answer the prayers of all of you and give me back to you. [do you have a spare room?] Epaphras, who is in prison with me for the sake of Christ Jesus, sends you his greetings, and so do my fellow-workers Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, and Luke. May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. [Bye for now, Paul] Perhaps the only thing that can be gained from this letter is to note Paul's eagerness to send a free man back into slavery. Paul also tries to dominate Philemon by using his status as "the ambassador of Christ Jesus" and the claim that Philemon "owes himself" to Paul (i.e. his soul and afterlife). He also invites himself to stay at Philemon's house. Romans is the 'Gold Standard' of Paul's teaching. This letter is summarised below:
Many parts of this letter are irrelevant to us and can be ignored, namely his greetings and planned trips (about three chapters of text). Much of his letter is rhetoric (text with little meaning or importance) like his discussions about Jews and Christians. In fact, his letters are a difficult read, mostly because you have to wade through a lot of text to get to a meaning that could be written much more concisely. Paul's main emphases in Romans are:
Romans 3:7-8: "But what if my untruth serves God's glory by making his truth stand out more clearly? Why should I still be condemned as a sinner? Why not say, then, 'Let us do evil so that good may come?' Some people, indeed, have insulted me by accusing me of saying this very thing! They will be condemned, as they should be." Paul sets himself up as 'The Authority' on God, and says that anyone who questions his teaching will be condemned. Paul has two large sections on 'not judging' in Romans. Essentially he is giving himself blanket authority to write whatever he wants without being questioned about it. His letters were the earliest Christian writings, and therefore had influence over many other people, even those who were eyewitnesses of Jesus. He continually asserts that he is a chosen apostle of Christ (his vision on the road to Damascus came from Satan along with the voices that he hears and the 'tongues' that he speaks). Paul wrote thirteen epistles in total. In his other epistles, a major emphasis is the setting up of church traditions. Paul was the source of the Church and the inclusion of his letters in the New Testament made the matter fixed. Jesus said nothing about church traditions; he condemned the Pharisees for this very thing. In fact, the only institution he set up was Holy Communion (a simple bread and wine tradition), and one purpose of this is to show that the Church is doing the wrong thing (see the letter on Joseph). One thing that should strike you when you start reading Romans is this. In 1:18-32, Paul says how bad everyone is, condemning them for their immorality and so on (at the time the Jews did not have the benefit of teaching from Jesus, so on what basis did he judge them?). Then just afterwards in 2:1 he says, "Do you, my friend, pass judgement on others?" He spends half a chapter judging others, then condemns others for judging. Most of the judging he does is for sexual immorality, yet Jesus doesn't seem especially bothered about this issue, given his friendship with Mary Magdalene. Jesus also says that the prostitutes and tax collectors are going to the Kingdom ahead of the people he was teaching (Matthew 21:28-32). The teachings of Jesus are focused on helping the poor and outcasts to society. Another thing that stands out is this paragraph:
18 I know that good does not live in me – that is, in my human nature. For even though the desire to do good is in me, I am not able to do it. 19 I don't do the good I want to do; instead, I do the evil that I do not want to do. 20 If I do what I don't want to do, this means that I am no longer the one who does it; instead, it is the sin that lives in me. A related verse is this one:
"Judge yourselves according to the amount of faith that God has given you." It isn't up to God to give us faith – it is up to us to do what Jesus said and to have faith in order to be able to do it.
1 Have the Jews then any advantage over the Gentiles? Or is there any value in being circumcised? 2 Much, indeed, in every way! In the first place, God trusted his message to the Jews. 3 But what if some of them were not faithful? Does this mean that God will not be faithful? 4 Certainly not! God must be true, even though every human being is a liar. As the scripture says, "You must be shown to be right when you speak; you must win your case when you are being tried."
6 For when we were still helpless, Christ died for the wicked at the time that God chose. 7 It is a difficult thing for someone to die for a righteous person. It may even be that someone might dare to die for a good person. 8 But God has shown us how much he loves us – it was while we were still sinners that Christ died for us! 9 By his blood we are now put right with God; how much more, then, will we be saved by him from God's anger! 10 We were God's enemies, but he made us his friends through the death of his Son. Now that we are God's friends, how much more will we be saved by Christ's life! 11 But that is not all; we rejoice because of what God has done through our Lord Jesus Christ, who has now made us God's friends.
I use everyday language because of the weakness of your natural selves.
So then, everything depends, not on what human beings want or do, but only on God's mercy.
1 Everyone must obey the state authorities, because no authority exists without God's permission, and the existing authorities have been put there by God. 2 Whoever opposes the existing authority opposes what God has ordered; and anyone who does so will bring judgement on himself. 3 For rulers are not to be feared by those who do good, but by those who do evil. Would you like to be unafraid of those in authority? Then do what is good, and they will praise you, 4 because they are God's servants working for your own good. But if you do evil, then be afraid of them, because their power to punish is real. They are God's servants and carry out God's punishment on those who do evil. 5 For this reason you must obey the authorities – not just because of God's punishment, but also as a matter of conscience. 6 That is also why you pay taxes, because the authorities are working for God when they fulfill their duties. Pay, then, what you owe them; pay them your personal and property taxes, and show respect and honour for them all. Authorities are put in place either by voters (who tend to vote selfishly) or by dictators, neither of which have anything to do with following Jesus. Jesus does say in Luke 20:25, "pay the Emperor what belongs to the Emperor, and pay God what belongs to God," but the implications of his other teachings suggest that his followers should be outside the taxation system. The Emperor and his taxation system don't have anything to do with God. Most people lean towards paying the Emperor, but then not paying God (this is everything we have; 100% of our productivity – Love the Lord with all your strength, heart, mind, body and soul).
In Matthew 17:25-26, Jesus tells a parable about taxes; "When Peter went into the house, Jesus spoke up first, 'Simon, what is your opinion? Who pays duties or taxes to the kings of this world? The citizens of the country or the foreigners?' Following Jesus keeps us out of the taxation system because, having given up what we have to follow Jesus, we are not earning. Therefore citizens (of the Kingdom of God) do not have to pay taxes. I will give an example of where it goes wrong for a modern Christian. An average Christian might work for a bank. The majority of their time is spent in finance. The infrastructure of society is set up by a minority of very rich people to make as much money as possible while spending the least. This means that the poor are oppressed all over the world, in sweat shops and through the use of child labour. In working for a bank, the employed Christian does much to support this by helping to provide financial support for the companies involved. They are then paid, of which one third goes in taxes, funding wars and so on – see "Tracing Sin to Death". Their wages are spent on a variety of things, the most expensive of which are often cars and mortgage repayments. A car burns petrol (over which wars are fought), costs a fortune and needs replacing after five years (the average price of a new car is about £15,000, costing an average of £500 per month to maintain and depreciating in value by about 7-14% per year). The remaining money is divided between their church and charitable giving. Money that goes to the church is spent on the church building and ministerial wage. The minister is employed to do baptisms, weddings, funerals and church services (singing hymns, praying and collecting money). The poor do not see any of this money. Therefore, the only part of the life of this average Christian that involves Jesus is the charitable giving and possibly some voluntary work. This is a relatively small part of their contribution to society, even though it might feel like a big contribution – their main contribution is towards the bank and taxation. In other words, this means that for every 100 Christians, there is perhaps one foreign aid worker who uses the money generated by them to work in third world countries. Instead of a self-sacrificial lifestyle, the church system is set up so that perhaps 1% of Christian productivity goes to where it is needed the most. Perhaps this is the reason for the unusual quotation of Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas verse 14, "if you give to charity, you will harm your spirits." The Gospel of Thomas is discussed in "Parables and General Issues". Here are some figures that I have estimated for the total productivity of this Christian:
35-40%: advancing the priorities of the bank. If you follow Jesus, you sell your possessions and give to the poor. You follow him instead of advancing the priorities of non-Christian organisations. The Church does nothing to address this, because it is part of the capitalist system itself (it requires money to finance Church buildings and ministerial wages). It also promotes hymn singing as an alternative to following Jesus. These problems stem from the acceptance of the letters of Paul. The Church has actually arisen from oppression of the poor; English cathedrals were built by people poorer than average modern day Africans, yet they were also required to give 10% of their income; by contrast, the priest was often the second eldest son of the local landowner.
Everyone has heard of your loyalty to the gospel, and for this reason I am happy about you. I want you to be wise about what is good, but innocent in what is evil. 1 Corinthians The Corinthians are claimed to be a mirror of the modern day Church. They had a strong economy, idols, a fractured church and 'immorality'. Paul sent them a letter to address these issues. I'm going to summarise it like I did with his letter to the Romans. This time I have annotated it so that the things that are incorrect or against Jesus are in bold, things of no relevance are underlined, and in normal text are the things that are less contentious, and the things that people could argue about (this includes instances where Paul has influenced the Gospel writers; he was a companion of both Luke and Mark as mentioned in 2 Timothy 4:11). Again, the poor are not mentioned in this letter.
Any 'rule' that Paul invents is wrong by default. The fact that his letters were made scripture means that Paul is "God's chosen king", which is how David describes Saul in the first book of Samuel. Paul's real name was Saul. Paul only became the 'king' because the people asked for him, just like they did for Saul – his letters were popular, and he won the popular vote to the extent that they were later included in the New Testament. Just because someone is popular doesn't mean that they are right. David never dreamed of killing Saul (because he was considered to be God's chosen king), even though Saul persecuted David. Similarly, Christians have never dreamed of removing Paul's letters from the Bible. However, Saul does die in battle and David assumes the throne, representing the widespread acceptance of Jesus in the future and the rejection of Pauline theology. Here are some verses from 1 Corinthians that stand out:
As in the previous analysis, the things that are irrelevant are underlined and the things that are wrong are in bold.
2:10-11: "I do it in Christ's presence because of you, in order to keep Satan from getting the upper hand of us; for we all know what his plans are." Do we? Paul says things like this without explaining them. If he had said something like, "Satan plans to put someone in the group of apostles as a false teacher which will lead to the time of the end," then we would have been much clearer on what his plans were. 3:16: "His veil was removed when he turned to the Lord" – Paul does nothing to remove a metaphorical veil. In fact, he puts a veil over the teaching of Jesus and substitutes them with endless waffle. A lot of his text says nothing at all and he is very skilled in doing this. He invents many phrases to do with the Spirit and Christ; these phrases become meaningless when they are analysed properly. For example, 2 Corinthians 3:14-18: "Their minds, indeed, were closed; and to this very day their minds are covered with the same veil as they read the books of the old covenant. The veil is removed only when a person is joined to Christ. Even today, whenever they read the Law of Moses, the veil still covers their minds. But it can be removed, as the scripture says about Moses: "His veil was removed when he turned to the Lord." Now, "the Lord" in this passage is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is present, there is freedom. All of us, then, reflect the glory of the Lord with uncovered faces; and that same glory, coming from the Lord, who is the Spirit, transforms us into his likeness in an ever greater degree of glory." Here's a break down of what he says: Closed minded people don't understand things properly (he complements the reader for their great understanding of his waffle). You only understand when you are "joined to Christ". "Joined" is the wrong word. We don't "join" to Christ we follow him. Paul defines the Lord as being the Spirit, which he then does not go on to talk about. In other words, according to Paul we must be "joined" to something that is invisible and poorly defined in his letters (see 1 Corinthians 12:1-11). When we achieve this state, Paul claims that we are free and the Spirit will go on to transform us into the likeness of Jesus. Paul's paragraph should really be written like this: Follow the teachings of Jesus. 2 Corinthians 8:13-14 talks about Christian giving: "I am not trying to relieve others by putting a burden on you; but since you have plenty at this time, it is only fair that you should help those who are in need. Then, when you are in need and they have plenty, they will help you. In this way both are treated equally." There are two phrases here that I don't like (a) "burden" and (b) "it is only fair" which reads as "giving is burdensome, but it is only fair to do it". Love your neighbour as you love yourself! This is actually how we should give thanks to God, not through words and language as Paul teaches; God was not establishing a business-like environment in which he would be 'The Boss', and where everyone else would have to tell him how great he is at regular intervals. Paul creates rules and is encourages people to enforce them with punishment in 10:6. Paul justifies himself:
1:8: "If we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel that is different from the one we preached to you, may he be condemned to hell!" Verse 1:12 is an important point: "I did not receive it [the Gospel] from any human being, nor did anyone teach it to me. It was Jesus Christ himself who revealed it to me." He was with a group of eyewitnesses, and he did not listen to any of them. The Gospels had not been written at the time, so he received all of his teachings from Satan. 3:1: "You foolish Galatians! Who put a spell on you? Before your very eyes you had a clear description of the death of Jesus Christ on the cross!" Paul implies that just a description of a death is sufficient understanding of Jesus. He comes across as being obsessive about the death of Christ and barely mentions his teachings or his life.
Now, it is clear that no one is put right with God by means of the Law, because the scripture says, "Only the person who is put right with God through faith shall live." But the Law has nothing to do with faith. Instead, as the scripture says, "Whoever does everything the Law requires will live."
Hence through subtle implication, this paragraph in Galatians implies that you don't need to follow Jesus because faith is implied not to involve doing anything unlike the Law. To make matters worse, grace and faith are linked in Ephesians 2:8.
But a go-between is not needed when only one person is involved.
For what our human nature wants is opposed to what the Spirit wants, and what the Spirit wants is opposed to what our human nature wants. These two are enemies, and this means that you cannot do what you want to do. Paul justifies himself:
Ephesians
Let us praise God for his glorious grace, for the free gift he gave us in his dear Son! For by the blood of Christ we are set free, that is, our sins are forgiven. How great is the grace of God, which he gave to us in such large measure!
For it is by God's grace that you have been saved through faith. It is not the result of your own efforts, but God's gift, so that no one can boast about it.
God revealed his secret plan and made it known to me. (I have written briefly about this, and if you will read what I have written, you can learn about my understanding of the secret of Christ).
Those who used to rob must stop robbing and start working, in order to earn an honest living for themselves and to be able to help the poor.
Here is a summary of the letter to the Philippians:
Keep on imitating me, my brothers and sisters. Pay attention to those who follow the right example that we have set for you. We should imitate and follow Jesus, not Paul.
All I want is to know Christ and to experience the power of his resurrection, to share in his sufferings and become like him in his death, in the hope that I myself will be raised from death to life.
Again, Paul justifies himself:
The teachings of Paul serve to replace the teachings of Jesus, paralleling what Delilah did to Samson:
"No one can break into a strong man's house and take away his belongings unless he first ties up the strong man; then he can plunder his house." Samson was a Nazerite (sounds like Nazareth where Jesus was born) and never had his hair cut (sounds like heir, to the throne of God – i.e. Jesus). Samson was very strong and killed a lion and many Philistines. Unfortunately he met Delilah who was paid by the Philistines to find out what gave Samson his strength so they could capture him. Eventually she found out that it was his hair (i.e. Jesus) that gave him his strength, so she cut it off when he was sleeping and gave him to the Philistines. In Judges 16:22 his hair started to grow again, giving him back his strength. When the Philistines wanted Samson to entertain them in front of Dagon (Dragon) their god, he pushed against the pillars of their building, collapsed it and killed the Philistines along with himself. This is a representation of the time of the end and Dagon represents Pauline theology.
As mentioned above, Delilah was paid by the Philistines to find out what gave Samson his strength so they could capture him. Delilah represents the epistle to the Philippians. However, it is in other letters that Paul discusses payment for church leadership. 1 Corinthians 9:11: "We have sown spiritual seed among you. Is it too much if we reap the material benefits from you?" 1 Corinthians 9:17: "If I did my work as a matter of free choice, then I could expect to be paid." 2 Corinthians 11:8: "While I was working among you, I was paid by other churches. I was robbing them, so to speak, in order to help you." 1 Timothy 5:17-18: "The elders who do good work as leaders should be considered worthy of receiving double pay, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching. For the scripture says, 'Do not muzzle an ox when you are using it to thresh corn' and 'Workers should be given their pay.'" Jesus does not advocate that his followers need to be paid a regular wage (in fact he says the exact opposite). Those who put Paul's letters into the Bible, and priests since that time have therefore had a vested interest in teaching Pauline theology over that of Jesus, purely because they depend on the words of Paul to earn a wage. In fact, God looks after those who follow the words of Jesus (but we need faith to follow them, and to depend on God when we have no money left). Colossians
2:4: "Do not let anyone deceive you with false arguments no matter how good they seem to be." What about the arguments of Jesus himself? The things that are highlighted in bold are in opposition to the teachings of Jesus. 1 Thessalonians
4:17: "We will meet the Lord in the air." Paul makes the time of the end sound desirable, when in fact it has to do with plagues and results from a complete separation from God, a separation that Paul himself instigates. The Old Testament disagrees with Paul's attitude towards the time of the end. For example, Amos 5:18-19: "How terrible it will be for you who long for the day of the Lord! What good will that day do you? For you it will be a day of darkness not of light. It will be like someone who runs from a lion and meets a bear! Or like someone who comes home and puts his hand on the wall, only to be bitten by a snake!" Paul was bitten by a snake at the end of the book of Acts, which may be a parable about his followers relating to this verse in the book of Amos. 2 Thessalonians
In 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12, Paul talks about the "Wicked One" and it is an good description of what Paul actually did. For example, the "Wicked One" is described to be the cause of a rebellion away from Jesus, which is what Paul did. However, many Christians may choose to believe that Paul is referring to my activities, which is Satan's purpose with these verses. The same is true of 1 Timothy 4:1-3. The RV Bible uses the term "lawless one" instead of "Wicked One", which would describe myself. Like the Wicked One he describes, Paul performed false miracles. For example, Satan withdrew evil spirits when a handkerchief of Paul was brought to a sick person without having to instruct the spirit to leave in the name of Jesus (Acts 19:12). One evil spirit said, "I know Paul and I know Jesus, but who are you?" – Acts 19:15. The evil spirits knew Paul, and must have known that they should leave a person if it made Paul look like a man of God. 1 Timothy
2 Timothy
Hebrews Although Hebrews is not a Pauline letter, the author is equally against the theology of Jesus.
Paul is discussed in the book of Daniel as described here. Paul is represented by the second and fourth beasts that Daniel saw and by a goat that attacks a ram. He is also the 3000th name in the Bible. Elijah 1 Kings 22:19-22 describes a spirit that steps forward to deceive people. The spirit was Satan, and he works through Paul. Please take a look at the letter on Elijah for more details. Saul and David – The First Book of Samuel This section describes the parallels between the story of Saul and David, and the interaction between Pauline theology and the teachings of Jesus. David and Jesus were both from Bethlehem. Saul and Paul were both Benjaminites. Saul persecuted David much like Paul teaches falsely about Jesus. Paul was originally called Saul and Jesus was called the Son of David by several people. Saul was called to be the king of Israel, against the advice of the Old Testament god through Samuel. In 1 Samuel chapter 8, Samuel warns the people that the king would charge them 10% taxes and make soldiers of their sons (representing all of the pointless tasks that go on in churches in addition to a 10% tithe). However, the people wanted a king, so god agreed and told Samuel to anoint Saul in chapter 10. Then Saul was told what would happen next (who he would meet) as proof that he would be king; similarly, Paul was told that he would meet Ananias. A group of prophets met Saul and he joined in with their ecstatic dancing and shouting (reflecting modern day Christianity) which led to the saying, "Has even Saul become a prophet?" (1 Samuel 10:12), because people were not expecting it, much like they were not expecting Paul to become an apostle. In chapter 12, Samuel reminds the people that they committed a sin in asking for a king. The people did this in the fourth century, when Paul's letters were incorporated into the New Testament and treated as scripture, equal in importance to the Gospel message. Saul's son Jonathan ate some food during the time that the Israelites were starving because of Saul's curse (chapter 14). Jonathan represents me because I am eating the spiritual food of Jesus (the name 'Jonathan' also sounds like John the Baptist's name, whose actions are a parable for this website as mentioned in "The Time of The End". Paul does indeed condemn anyone who 'eats spiritual food' because anyone who follows Jesus is not following what Paul says. 15:35: "The Lord was sorry that he had made Saul king of Israel." In verse 16:13, Samuel anointed David as king. David was the son of Jesse (which sounds like 'Jesus'). Later in chapter 16, an evil spirit (Satan) was sent to torment Saul and it made him go mad, so a man who knew how to play the harp (David) was sent for to calm Saul. Harps are often associated with angels. Chapter 17 describes the Philistine army which had a huge warrior called Goliath (another representation of Paul). He challenged the army of Saul to find a man that could defeat him – if anyone could then the Philistine army would become slaves of the Israelites, otherwise, the Israelites would become slaves of the Philistines. In 1 Samuel 17:16, Goliath challenged the Israelites every morning and evening for forty days (the same time period as the flood of Noah). Saul promised that any Israelite who could defeat Goliath would not have to pay taxes (1 Samuel 17:25). This is because when Goliath is defeated, temple tax (or 'the collection') will be abolished. In addition, only followers of Jesus can defeat Pauline theology, and they do not pay taxes because they are outside the taxation system. Later in chapter 17, David killed Goliath. He did it using only a sling shot and a stone (representing Jesus – he describes himself as a stone in verses like Mark 12:10). Saul persecuted David and his men. David's men were outcasts to society (1 Samuel 22:2), much like the people who Jesus came to teach about. Saul was eventually killed in battle, and David assumed the Royal Throne. Letters from the other apostles In the letters of the apostles, emphasis is placed on the importance of prayer, belief in Jesus as a replacement for animal sacrifices (this would have been a big change from Judaism), concerns about immorality, false teachers and patiently waiting for the end to come. The apostles believed that the end would be very soon (e.g. 1 John 2:18), which perhaps encouraged them to think that they did not need to do very much because the end would come quickly and sort everything out. However, 2000 years later, we are still awaiting the end. They also thought that people had individually defeated Satan (1 John 2:13), so a more holistic approach was not attempted. The apostles lived in a society that was relatively poor. They would not have been able to conceive of modern day inequality, so they did not place emphasis on helping the poor. The authors of these letters probably did not expect them to become scripture and were not writing to people 2000 years in the future. The letter from James is the best one because it emphasizes doing what Jesus says rather than just having a vague belief in him. However, it still supports the Ten Commandments (James 2:10-11) and the church system (James 5:14). In James 1:5-8, importance is placed on believing what you say in prayer (the stronger you believe, the more likely you are to receive). This is false teaching; I can pray and believe anything I choose, yet this prayer and this type of belief is totally non-functional. Believing that what Jesus says is true, and a consequent ability to do what he says is the real meaning behind 'belief in Jesus'. The Gospels were not written at first and many people would not have been able to read, so early Christians had to rely on memory and word of mouth for teachings about Jesus. This was distorted by Pauline theology and Satan pretending to be the Holy Spirit. Given the confusion surrounding Jewish theology, Pauline theology, direct Satanic intervention, a lack of education and extreme poverty, it is unsurprising that the teaching from the apostles does not reflect what Jesus intended for us. Eli falls over backwards and breaks his neck
I look at the Great Lakes of America and I see a picture of Eli having fallen over backwards and broken his neck when he was told that the covenant box had been stolen (1 Samuel 4:18). The city of St. Paul is marked on the map. Eli represents the priesthood (his sons stole from the congregation). His falling over backwards is symbolic of the fall of the priesthood and the modern church system upon finding out the Paul has stolen the 'covenant box' (true teachings of Jesus). 1 Chronicles 13:3 says, "Then we will go and fetch God's Covenant Box, which was ignored while Saul was king," reinforcing the idea that the true teachings of Jesus have been ignored due to the teachings of Paul. The covenant box had been stolen by the Philistines, who found that they were punished for it. They eventually returned the box to the Israelites along with a gift of gold. In other words, the financial resources of the Church (represented by the Philistines) should be used to help the poor, and priests should not try to prevent people from following Jesus. Paul's teachings are Satanic, and he used his influence and false miracles to distort the Gospel message and establish a tradition-based church system. Later, his epistles were collected into the New Testament as scripture, competing with the Gospel message in modern times. This is the primary method by which Satan has stopped people from following Jesus. The results are palaces built for God while 2.5 billion people remain in poverty.
|